Prop. 22 promised improved pay and benefits for California gig workers. But when companies fail to deliver, the state isn’t doing much to help push back.

State’s highest court refuses to overturn voter-backed Prop. 22, a law written by the gig industry allowing some independent contractors.

The stock market has soared to new heights, prompting a record number of Silicon Valley companies to go public.

Investors, who flocked to companies like Zoom as the virus spread, have started to look elsewhere.

The new law didn’t fulfill promises of change, some say. Now the measure is starting to having ripple effects across the state.

The South Bay’s food halls have seen better days—but there may be some hope on the horizon.

The ordinances limit how much money food-delivery apps can charge mom-and-pop restaurants struggling to survive the pandemic.

If San Jose approves the fee cap, it would last through next June, at which point the City Council may choose to extend or suspend it.

Local leaders will consider regulating one of restaurants’ major costs when on-site dining isn’t allowed: third-party delivery charges. 

The Greater Downtown San Jose Economic Recovery Task Force has handed down a slate of proposals to sustain the city’s core. 

Now, with the presidential race still undecided, the state’s war over gig work could also sway the national conversation over the future of work.

Gig companies embark on a last-minute spending blitz after labor groups question campaign tactics.

Young Californians have been at the forefront of fighting back against the injustices and shortcomings that the pandemic has intensified.

Proposition 22 is a heist in plain sight orchestrated by some of the wealthiest liars and thieves of our modern Gilded Age.

Courier apps such as GrubHub and DoorDash can charge Mission City restaurants no more than 15 percent under a new temporary ordinance.

The #GuacOff campaign is the latest initiative supporting gig workers as they play an increasingly important role in the economy.