On Wednesday, as the workers of the Shasta County Registrar of Voters office busily sifted through the ballots that have already been cast, they had company.
A group of nine people, holding clipboards and taking notes, stood in a hallway peering through wired glass as workers took ballots out of envelopes. Across the hallway another group of observers hovered over computer screens, watching a live video feed of workers in a room verifying signatures. These self-appointed election observers spent their day looking for proof of tomfoolery.
One woman wasn’t satisfied with watching the election administration through the buttressed window. She wanted to be in the room while they sifted through ballots.
“It isn’t transparent,” said a woman named Elizabeth who wouldn’t give her last name. “To be transparent we have to be able to hear them.”
So far, while these observers don’t appear to have unearthed any evidence of fraud, they are having an impact. The assistant clerk put up a rope to stop the observers from following workers into their breakroom to ask questions. They’ve also had to put locks on the offices, after observers tried to open doors and see what was happening inside each office. This comes as election officials across the nation received death threats following the 2020 and 2022 elections, fomented by former President Donald Trump’s false claims that the election was stolen.
Workers in Shasta are quitting. Tanner Johnson signed up to be an account clerk because he wanted to help protect democracy. “I felt called to do this job,” he said. But, after a little more than a year in the registrar’s office, he quit on Wednesday.
Voters are legally allowed to enter the office and observe the election process. Johnson said a lot of them, however, are on edge and “very angry.” “They want to catch us in a lie, so they’ll try to trick you into saying something,” he said. “A lot of times they’ll be secretly videotaping you or recording you.”
Ten of the registrar’s 21 employees have left, he said. Many of the people who remain are working their first election. “A lot of people who have left just because it’s not worth it,” he said. “I make $19.64 an hour. I’m not going to be a martyr for $19.60 an hour.”
While the most high-profile election conspiracies emanate from swing states like Michigan and Georgia, the battle over democracy continues to rage across California. Most California Republicans in Congress won’t commit to certifying the results of the presidential election. And in Shasta County, the epicenter of the state’s election denial movement since 2020, a fight over what was once a mundane bureaucracy – the registrar of voters office – threatens to tear the community apart.
With tensions mounting, the longtime registrar of voters, Cathy Darling Allen, retired early in May after being diagnosed with heart failure. To replace her, the county Board of Supervisors passed over Darling Allen’s longtime No. 2, Joanna Francescut, and hired a prosecutor with no election administration experience in June, with just months to go before the presidential election.
The new registrar, Tom Toller, impressed Republicans on the board with his stated willingness to stand up to the California Secretary of State’s Office. But just three months into his tenure, one of those supervisors, Patrick Jones, has already turned on him, according to the Redding Record Searchlight.
Jones said at a recent supervisors meeting that he met with Toller to see tests of the voting system, and alleged seeing election law violations and mistakes.
Toller originally agreed to meet with CalMatters on Tuesday, but when a reporter arrived, he was out sick.
Johnson said Francescut, who stayed on as deputy, handles much of the day-to-day work at the office. “He’s really busy dealing with the political aspect of it,” Johnson said. “People aren’t happy with him. County supervisors show up all the time.”
Francescut said the staff departures just compound the pressure. “This is a high stress job when things are going well, when things are going smooth, when we have staff trained,” she said.
“Nobody goes to school and says, ‘Hey, I wanna be an elections official.’ There isn’t official training on that. It’s a lot of on-the-job training, on-the-job experience,” Francescut said.
The departures worried Darling Allen. “I’m just very distressed that we have people at this time in the calendar so upset and so concerned about their own safety that they’re going to walk out,” she said. “But it’s not worth anyone’s life. And you know, no election official was hired as a first responder, and they certainly aren’t trained as first responders, nor are they paid as first responders.”
Darling Allen said they had to begin keeping narcan – a medication that reverses drug overdoses – in the office after other election offices, including Yuba County, received mail containing fentanyl.
She called Shasta a microcosm of what’s happening nationally. “You know, this is happening all over the place,” she said.
Sergio Olmos is a reporter with CalMatters.
She called Shasta a microcosm of what’s happening nationally. “You know, this is happening all over the place,” she said.
baaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahaha
slop
if this was happening all over the country, they wouldn’t have to huff it up to Shasta to get that picture
the theme of this of course is that crazy right-wing Karen is the next true threat to our “Democracy” distracting you from the reality that Biden was coup’ed and Kamala was appointed by the billionaires essentially to lose and how damaging that is to our so-called democracy
baaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaahahahahahaha
it is so entertaining how serious you take yourselves
Once upon a time, a long, long time ago, Redding was a good potential retirement city.
Once upon a time, “State of Jefferson” actually was amusing and even had respect.
Now you have Redding and Shasta County far righties (some religious types, included, so expect some election doubters to be book banners, too) making even the opposition to progressive government bad. The subjects of this article are the lightweights insofar as their mentalities and physical threats there.
Add that to other problems in the state that even make remote parts less of an escape than before.
They are having a hard time coping with the Republican candidate, President Trump, just demolishing Kamala in the electoral college and the popular vote. ON top of that – it must’ve been really distressing for liberals to watch the Republicans also take control of the senate and house. They will need safe spaces and furry puppies to comfort them over the next few weeks.
I’m actually surprised that while you have there is the garbage like Kimmel’s Tears, and there are others are who are upset, there’s at least the broaching of the subject among the Dems in the media that they got something very wrong, as did the polls and much nation-wide public perception before the election happened. What the Dems got wrong wasn’t so much the priorities as what so many long have noted, their disdain for working people, especially white (and usually male) working people, a part of why Hispanic and black males also voted for Trump. (It wasn’t all just the “Rogaine” Insecurity Vote.)
Ya know, I am not so sure this was a landslide they got so wrong…
Was there a significant popular vote shift, yes, could that is a rhetorical point.
However, Trump won
PA by 144,972
WI by 33,050
MI by 77,030
Scott Pressler and PA Chase were an unmeasurable factor in PA, they got a lot of unlikely conservative voters out. Trump won 45% of the 18-29 demo in WI, and 49% of the 18-29 in MI; which seems very high for that age bracket historically, in my recollection.
Harris could easily have won the electoral college and lost the popular vote and their polls may very well have shown that. The real eye opener in my mind was the rightward lurch in NY, NJ and the southeast.
Keep in mind with the migration patterns, post 2030 census estimates put the GOP in the white house even if they lose MI, WI, and PA.
Place your bets appropriately gentlemen.
An article by Francis Fukuyama includes a diagram of right versus left shifting by categories, unfortunately not by regions, but serving well to illustrate the shift, and the related US map shows a strong shift rightward in the NYC metropolitan area.
https://www.ft.com/content/f4dbc0df-ab0d-431e-9886-44acd4236922
Multiple links to maps can’t be provided, so here you are, if you want to see effective migration.
OKC 2100 — but maybe put them on the Panhandle.
https://www.census.gov/geographies/reference-files/time-series/geo/centers-population.html