Scroll from the bottom up to read in chronological order. And click here to catch up on the rest of our coronavirus coverage. 

5:42pm: New cases, more deaths.

5:23pm: Code blue.

5:16pm: Deputies fall ill.

4pm: Eye on the Y.

2:35pm: Inmate tests positive.

1:05pm: What a relief.

Local leaders set up an $11 million relief fund for people suffering an economic blow from the pandemic. Click here to read SJI reporter Grace Hase’s article about the effort.

12:58pm: Court adjourned.

The Santa Clara County Superior Court is taking steps to help stop the spread of COVID-19 by limiting access to visitors to the day of their hearing. The same goes for witnesses subpoenaed to testify and attorneys.

“The court is taking additional precautions to promote social distancing guidelines and the safety and well-being of the public, courtroom staff, sheriff’s deputies, judicial officers and those who have essential business at the courthouse,” Presiding Judge Ryan said in a Monday morning news release. “If you do not have a hearing taking place at the Court please do not come to the courthouse during this time.”

Those experiencing any kind of illness should not show up for in-person hearings and are encouraged to attend via CourtCall 888.88.COURT or other remote options.

Jurors, attorneys and other parties should direct questions to 

co***@sc******.org











 or 408.882.2700. Jurors who received a notice to serve from now through March 30 are officially excused from jury duty.

—Grace Hase

12:10pm: The count must go on.

Last year, we were all rightfully worried about how adding a citizenship test on theU.S. Census form would prevent people from participating in the decennial count. Now, we face chilling effect we would have never imagined just weeks ago.

The coronavirus pandemic threatens to leave vast swaths of the nation undercounted, which would undermine our democracy for years to come.

Santa Clara County officials held a virtual press conference today to address this grave threat on a long-held custom that determines how much representation we get in our government and how much funding we receive down the line.

For more information about the census, go to my2020census.gov or call 844.330.2020 (for English, 844.468.2020 (for Spanish) and 844.461.2020 (for Vietnamese).

11:11am: Something in the air.

A fifth TSA worker at the Mineta San Jose International Airport has tested positive for COVID-19. The security employee last worked on the evening of March 11 at the passenger screening checkpoint of Terminal A. Meanwhile, city officials say a SJC employee who also tested positive may have had limited contact with airport tenants.

11:02am: Milpitas on alert.

Two Milpitas firefighters and one of their spouses have tested positive for COVID-19, according to a Monday morning news release. All three are quarantined at home.

The Milpitas Fire Department’s designated infection control officer was alerted over the weekend that the firefighters tested positive. Five others in the department were exposed to the first confirmed case, including the other infected colleague. Three have shown symptoms and the remaining firefighter has no apparent signs of illness.

A Milpitas fire recruit who participated in a recent fire academy training was also exposed to a separate case and is showing symptoms. All of the individuals exposed are under home isolation for the next two weeks.

10am: Perks for the clerks.

United Food and Commercial Workers Local 5 reached a deal with Safeway granting grocery workers stronger protections as they become frontline workers in a pandemic.

The agreement includes more scheduling flexibility to accommodate childcare and expanded use of paid sick leave. Workers will get up to two weeks of pay if they contract the coronavirus or have to self-quarantine because of exposure. The contract also calls for stricter sanitizing for employees and customers, assures that stores will hire temps only after offering existing workers additional hours and that all staffers will get a $2-an-hour bump for at least two weeks.

“Local 5 members are working around the clock to assure that families have the food and supplies they need,” union President John Nunes said. “Along with healthcare workers, they are truly first responders during this growing crisis.”

The UFCW is also asking the state to require grocers to give workers more paid leave, free COVID-19 testing and consistent access to hand washing, cleaners and protective gear.

9:16am: Hospitals get surge-ready.

As the outbreak continues apace, Santa Clara County is welcoming help from the federal government in setting up a temporary medical facility in a local event venue.

By placing between 250 and 290 beds in the Santa Clara Convention Center, health officials hope to ease the burden on the county’s nine-hospital system by taking in patients who need treatment for issues unrelated to coronavirus.

A U.S. Department of Health and Human Services affiliate would run the operation, according to a memo detailing the strategy. Valley Med Chief Medical Officer Paul Lorenz explained Sunday in a Facebook Live talk that the venue conversion is part of a broader “surge plan” to offload some patients to alternative sites.

The main driver behind the kinds of social-distancing mandates that brought the economy to a stop this past week is to slow the outbreak enough that U.S. hospitals don’t get bombarded with too many critically sick patients at the same time.

According to recently released data from a Harvard Global Health Institute study led by Dr. Ashish Jha, the South Bay has a total of 2,250 hospital beds, about 64 percent of which are usually occupied. That bed count includes 340 ICU spots, which are best prepared to handle acute coronavirus cases, per the American Hospital Association.

Of Santa Clara County’s 1.9 million residents, census data show that about 12 percent are 65 years or older—a demographic particularly susceptible to the respiratory failure seen in the most severe COVID-19 infections.

So, let’s say our lockdown initiatives “flatten the curve” just moderately, meaning 40 percent of adults contract COVID-19 in the coming year. Even then, the South Bay would need to expand surge capacity at its local hospitals based on estimates from the Harvard study showing that 8 percent of infected adults would require hospital care, which amounts to an estimated 120,000 patients with an average of 12-day inpatient stays.

In that scenario, Santa Clara County would require 3,990 beds over 12 months—about 4.4 times what’s available now.

Intensive care units would be hit the hardest, researchers found. Even without coronavirus patients, ICUs in this county typically have just 150 available beds, which is nearly six times less than what’s needed to care for the most severe coronavirus cases.

Again, that’s just in a moderate scenario.

The worst-case outcome projected by Dr. Jha and his team, in which 60 percent of the county gets infected in just six months, would force healthcare staff to basically choose who should live and who should die because of a lack of resources. That’s the situation unfolding in Italy now, and one that prompted Santa Clara County Public Health Officer Dr. Sara Cody to call for the sweeping lockdown that’s now going on week two.

Though hospitals in urban areas like ours stand to bear the brunt of the surge, researchers at Harvard say they’re also better prepared than their smaller counterparts to stretch resources in times of crisis. And that’s exactly what’s happening here now as the number of Santa Clara County COVID-19 cases surpassed 300 on Sunday and the death toll broke the double-digit mark for the first time.

I believe we’re in capable hands.

That said, I’d like to see more transparency from our county leaders. While the public health department has posted daily updates to the confirmed-case and fatality count online, it’s been silent about how much testing’s being done.

While I wrote about how Rachel Maddow lavished praise upon the Santa Clara County for its clear and effective public health communication, Trump’s CDC fielded criticism for dodging questions about testing. Now, I’m starting to wonder what’s taking our local authorities so long to tell us what they know about their own testing capacity—or, if they lack comprehensive data, to acknowledge as much to the public.

I raised the question over the weekend after eight days went by with the county ignoring our questions about local testing capacity. In a March 14 email to public health spokeswoman Joy Alexiou, I asked for, among other things, the total number of patients tested, total samples required to get an accurate reading for each person and a list of testing sites in the South Bay.

When I didn’t hear back, I forwarded the email to the county’s main emergency press address. When I still didn’t hear back, I called to find out what’s holding things up. In one of those calls, a spokesman named Roger (who wouldn’t share his last name with us) took down the questions and said he’d get back to me by late afternoon the next day.

He never did.

So when I wrote an update about the ongoing testing scarcity on Sunday, I made note of our futile attempts to learn about the extent of the county’s diagnostic efforts in an article and on Twitter, where many others shared our concern about the lack of transparency.

San Jose Councilman-elect Matt Mahan fired off a series of tweets at about the same time I did last night about the incomplete data.

“Local press ought to provide a big asterisk next to these official Santa Clara County case count numbers,” he wrote. “They are way too low and may lead people to think COVID-19 is less widespread than it is. To explain: The official data imply that 35 percent of known cases require hospitalization and just over 3 percent result in death. These ratios are too high. In fact, they are outside the range seen elsewhere, at least before a health system is overwhelmed. More realistic assumptions are that closer to 15 to 20 percent of cases require hospitalization and about 1 percent result in death.”

With a more realistic death rate of about 1 percent, he went on to say, we should expect that about 1,000 people in the county have COVID-19—not 302. That implies that three-and-a-half times more people have the disease than the official case count tells us.

“Essentially,” Mahan continued. “the case count is meaningless without significantly more testing. As a matter of transparency, @HealthySCC ought to be reporting the number of daily tests completed and press should make clear that the case count represents a significant undercount at this stage.”

Other counties have provided constituents with data about testing—even the lack thereof. In Orange County, where officials reported 95 confirmed cases on Sunday, they also noted the total number of people tested by public and commercial labs: 1,585.

When we spoke to Santa Clara County Executive Jeff Smith last night about his agency’s lack of comparable data, he chalked it up to employees being overwhelmed.

“Our communications team has been confused and befuddled,” he told me. “I don’t know exactly the situation with your particular questions, but there’s been a lot of challenges with the EOC [Emergency Operations Center]. The workload’s been pretty immense.”

Meanwhile, he added, there simply aren’t enough people to conduct the level of “community surveillance”—public health parlance for finding out who passed the virus on to whom. “All of this is rough stuff,” he said, “as you can imagine.”

It’s safe to assume that anywhere from 4,000 to 5,000 people in Santa Clara County actually have the virus but don’t know because it’s mild or asymptomatic.

“And if each of them infect a few people a week, it just gets harder to trace,” he said.

On Sunday night, Smith said he didn’t have an answer about the total number of tests conducted, but that he’d get me more info on that today. In the meantime, here’s what he does know. The county’s public health lab can only use CDC kits, each of which has supplies for roughly 500 tests. The county lab tests 45 to 50 patients a day. Private labs can do more because they make their own tests.

However, it’s unclear how many tests private labs are conducting because the law only requires them to disclose positives. Smith said the county’s in the process of revising its public health order to get those private labs—including Quest, Stanford and Sunnyvale’s Cepheid—to disclose data about all tests.

I asked him whether the lack of exhaustive data hampers the county’s efforts.

“I guess I would say yes,” he replied. “And the efforts have been changing pretty dramatically. Initially, the focus was on trying to identify and mitigate the disease, then we switched rapidly to community distancing and now the real issue is trying to prevent the health system from getting overwhelmed. So that’s the big focus, and yes, it would be much more effective from an epidemiological perspective to have an idea of what the testing capacity looks like, to know more about the transmission. But at this point, at a l0cal level, we’re in much more of a reactive mode than a planning mode.”

Smith and countless others under his purview have had an exhausting few weeks, so we thanked him for taking the time to help us get to the bottom of all this. Seeing so many people go through so much at the same time is a tremendous burden, he acknowledged.

“This is a disaster to begin with, but on top of that we have all these individuals who can’t go to work,” he said. “And here at the county we have a lot of duties and responsibilities and—basically everything’s being knocked off kilter and we’re doing the best we can.”